- FraudScott+Scott has extensive experience litigating securities fraud on behalf of our governmental entity, institutional, and individual clients, serving as lead counsel in numerous securities class actions since the enactment of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). Through our commitment to the best interests of those the Firm represents, Scott+Scott has successfully obtained exceptional monetary results on behalf of investors.
- Restraining Order
- Corporate LawScott+Scott has a proven track record of success in litigating shareholder derivative, corporate governance, and transactional matters. We have been singularly successful in vindicating shareholder rights and, as a result, are routinely at the forefront in fashioning the standards in this area of law.
- Antitrust“Northeastern dairy farmers face dire straits,” said Brian Clark, a partner with Lockridge Grindal Nauen. “Over the last several years, Northeastern dairy farmers have seen their milk pay plummet, and many have been forced out of business. DFA is a recidivist actor, previously sued in the Northeast for antitrust violations. The situation is now worse than ever, with a more consolidated market that DFA has manipulated to the detriment of Northeastern dairy farmers, as alleged in the complaint,” said Clark.
- Sexual HarassmentVictoria’s Secret in particular has been targeted by a string of stockholder records demands and complaints alleging damages caused by what one Delaware records demand described as “a culture of sexual harassment and misogyny that has plagued the company and Victoria’s Secret” for decades.
- TrustsAlso, in Delaware Chancery Court, deLeeuw Law LLC and Greenfield & Goodman LLC for Nancy A. Lambrecht, co-trustee of the Amanda Greenfield 2012 Irrevocable Trust, and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, Bernstein Liebhard LLP and Smith Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP for John Giarratano and Maryann Kualii.
- ForeclosureBeginning in at least May 2016, the complaint alleges DFA attempted to or did monopsonize the market for raw Grade A milk in the Northeast. The lawsuit alleges that DFA did so by foreclosing Northeast dairy farmers’ ability to market their milk independently of DFA, and even foreclosed farmers’ ability to profitably market their milk through DFA. It achieved this foreclosure through a series of anticompetitive actions at both the cooperative and processing levels of the Northeast raw Grade A milk market. All of these actions were directed to reducing the prices paid to Northeast dairy farmers for their raw milk.